GeoStudysGEOTECHNICS | ENVIRONMENT | GEOTHERMAL
Technical articles  /  Method sheets  /  M02
GeoStudysMethod sheets
SHEET 02 · SEPTEMBER 2026 · FIELD DATA
METHOD M02BOREHOLE LOG

Plausibility check of borehole logs

Why every field entry is checked before it becomes a log, a section or a calculation.

Download PDF A4 · 1 PAGEREADING TIME APPROX. 3 MINUTES · AS OF 25 SEPT 2026
At a glance
Purpose
Find errors from field logging and transcription before they propagate into annexes, sections and calculations.
Input
Input workbook per project: header data (drilling date, final depth, collar elevation, groundwater), layer rows, blow counts of the dynamic probing.
Output
One internal check page per exploratory point, based on fixed rules. The annex sheet goes to the client only once all issues are resolved.
Limitations
The check finds contradictions, not an internally consistent misdescription. Whether a silt is a silt is decided by field description and laboratory.
Standards
DIN EN ISO 14688-1 and -2, DIN EN ISO 22475-1, DIN EN ISO 22476-2, DIN 18196, DIN 4023
A drawing smooths over errors. A check names them.Principle of the method
Check result per exploratory point and flags by type — anonymised
← SWIPE IMAGE SIDEWAYS →
Figure 1. Underground cable route with 47 exploratory points, data entered after the first week of fieldwork (anonymised). a) Check result per exploratory point; open: not yet drilled. b) The eight issues by type – six formal contradictions, two in the soil-mechanical description.

01Three check levels

LevelWhat is checkedExample from Figure 1How
formalLayer boundaries monotonic and without gaps; final depth equals base of last layer; end of dynamic probing consistent with final depth; drilling date plausible; collar elevation present; no duplicate sample numbersDrilling date 31.08.2006 instead of 2026automatic
soil-mechanicalConsistency only for cohesive, relative density only for non-cohesive groups; for SU*, ST*, GU*, GT* the field description decides; soil group valid to DIN 18196; house rule: topsoil OH mostly loose, deviation flagged“loose” for silt ULautomatic
against geodataGlacial till “carbonate-free” → check decalcified zone; collar elevations against DTM1; borehole against geological mapCollar elevations within DTM1 accuracy (≤ ±0.3 m)partly automatic, partly during processing
|zE − zn| ≤ 0.01 m|zDPH − zE| ≤ 0.30 m(1)

zE final depth per header data · zn base of last layer · zDPH end of dynamic probing. Tolerances are in-house check rules, not values from standards; exceeding them triggers a flag, not a silent correction.

02What the check found

  • Drilling date 2006: not visible in any drawing – every log would have carried a wrong date.
  • Borehole 12 m, probing 8 m: two exploratory points were taken deeper than planned. Without the flag, the extra work would have gone unnoticed.
  • Layer row at 2.80 m appended to a 6 m borehole: a transcription leftover that would have reversed the sequence of strata.
  • Final depth 4.0 m, layers to 6.0 m: header data and log disagree; resolved from the field record, not at the desk.

03Where the check sits

The check page is generated as the second page of every annex sheet and is dropped only on delivery. The input workbook accepts only genuine date values; on locking, formulas are replaced by values so that no link to another workbook remains.

Only checked borehole logs go into the geotechnical cross-section with confidence level [3] and into the calculations.

Standards and references
  1. DIN EN ISO 14688-1 and -2:2020-11 Benennung, Beschreibung und Klassifizierung von Boden · DIN 18196:2023-02 Bodenklassifikation für bautechnische Zwecke
  2. DIN EN ISO 22475-1:2022-02 Probenentnahme · DIN EN ISO 22476-2:2012-03 Rammsondierungen · DIN 4023:2023-02 Zeichnerische Darstellung der Ergebnisse von Bohrungen
  3. GeoStudys Method sheet 01 (2026) Layer boundaries with confidence level
GEOSTUDYS METHOD SHEETS · M02 · 2026WWW.GEOSTUDYS.COM

SUGGESTED CITATION: GeoStudys Consulting (2026): Plausibility check of borehole logs. GeoStudys Method sheets, Sheet M02. www.geostudys.com/en/technical-articles/borehole-log-plausibility-check.html